A well-established building system
SIPs have a long history in the U.S. housing industry. Early versions were developed in the mid ’30s at the Forest Products Laboratory, and the first foam-core panel was produced more than a half century ago. SIPs have never quite broken into the housing mainstream, but they offer a number of advantages over conventional stick framing.
SIP construction is more expensive than standard frame construction, but because the resulting building envelope is tighter and insulation values potentially higher, using them may make it possible to downsize heating and cooling equipment. Lower operating costs over the life of the building should mean a net gain over conventional construction.
By far the most common type of foam used in panels, expanded polystyrene (EPS) has an R-value of 3.6 per inch. Its low melting point is an advantage to builders who need to make field alterations with heated cutting tools. It has a fairly high perm rating of 3. EPS is the least expensive option.
Polyurethane and polyisocyanurate.
Nearly identical chemically, these foams have an R-value of about 6 or 7 per inch. They are more expensive and somewhat less widely available than EPS. Their higher melting point means that recesses for wiring and boxes must be drilled or routed instead of cut with a heated tool. They have a perm rating of 1, making them effective vapor barriers.
At least three manufacturers make extruded polystyrene (XPS) panels. The foam is more expensive than EPS but has an R-value of 5 per inch and a perm rating of 1. It also has a high melting point. The companies are Foard Panel of New Hampshire, of Pennsylvania, and of Vermont.
Wheat and rice straw. At least one manufacturer now produces an SIP product…
This article is only available to GBA Prime Members
Sign up for a free trial and get instant access to this article as well as GBA’s complete library of premium articles and construction details.
Already a member? Log in