GBA Logo horizontal- lakesideca.info Facebook- lakesideca.info LinkedIn- lakesideca.info Email- lakesideca.info Pinterest- lakesideca.info Twitter- lakesideca.info Instagram- lakesideca.info YouTube Icon- lakesideca.info Navigation Search Icon- lakesideca.info Main Search Icon- lakesideca.info Video Play Icon- lakesideca.info Audio Play Icon- lakesideca.info Headphones Icon- lakesideca.info Plus Icon- lakesideca.info Minus Icon- lakesideca.info Check Icon- lakesideca.info Print Icon- lakesideca.info Picture icon- lakesideca.info Single Arrow Icon- lakesideca.info Double Arrow Icon- lakesideca.info Hamburger Icon- lakesideca.info TV Icon- lakesideca.info Close Icon- lakesideca.info Sorted- lakesideca.info Hamburger/Search Icon- lakesideca.info
Lakesideca News

IRS Allows Tax Credit for Solar Battery Retrofit

The ruling affects only the couple requesting the tax break, but some insiders say it's a breakthrough

Batteries added to a solar photovoltaic system in a retrofit will qualify for a federal tax credit, but the IRS ruling has only a limited impact for now.
Image Credit: Rob Tinworth via

The Internal Revenue Service has ruled that batteries added to a residential solar system as part of a retrofit qualify for a 30% federal tax credit, but the decision has only a limited impact for now.

The homeowners who made the request aren’t identified by name. They requested the IRS ruling last year after adding batteries to a grid-tied photovoltaic system they had installed earlier. The batteries — with a capacity of 13.5 kilowatt hours and a power rating of 5 kW — were wired into the system so they could only be charged by the solar panels, not by grid electricity.

With that in mind, Peter Friedman, a senior technical reviewer, granted the request for the tax credit. But, added, “this ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it.”

, which first reported on the ruling, called the decision a in which a decision is issued in response to a written request from a taxpayer and “may not be relied on as precedent by other taxpayers or IRS personnel.”

Under those conditions, it wouldn’t seem as if the ruling would have much if any impact on homeowners at large.

But the article quotes Brett Simon, a GTM Research analyst, as saying the ruling has a lot of potential for solar installers looking for new opportunities in the market. “It’s just a single case,” he said, “but is nevertheless important because it reveals how the IRS views retrofits, and could lead to a future guidance that allows for all retrofits of storage to take the ITC. If that happened, the floodgates would open.”

says that the IRS “has ruled privately on multiple occasions that storage devices including batteries are eligible” for the tax credit. It cites private-letter rulings in 2011 and 2012, but points out the rules are more restrictive for “dual use” equipment, which stores electricity derived from more than one source.

said taxpayers should be able to “rest easy in taking the tax credit” as long as the batteries are charged only by solar panels.

Kelly Speakes-Backman, CEO of the Energy Storage Association, said the ruling “marks a milestone” for the solar-plus-storage industry.

“The 30% credit is like jumping ahead five years on the cost curve for home battery systems — so on that count, customers will be able to afford longer-duration systems sooner and present greater opportunity for self-reliance,” she told the website.

Under current rules, the 30% investment tax credit begins to drop in 2020 and expires altogether at the end of 2021.

2 Comments

  1. David Williams | | #1

    Would this 30% tax credit
    Would this 30% tax credit also apply to the cost of replacing batteries in a pre-existing solar system which is charged only by solar panels?

  2. user-6793320 | | #2

    qualified "yes"
    Hi David,

    The principal inherent to the decision in the private letter supports a positive answer to your question, but the private letter ruling has no precedential value so the IRS could find just the opposite. This isn't bureaucratese—just a sign that the issue is fairly new and unsettled for the IRS, so they reserve the right to make a policy decision at a latter date.

    The safest approach would be request answer from them directly. If you're up for it, you can learn how here: . It looks like the cost is $275.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Related

Community

Recent Questions and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
https://medicaments-24.com

www.medicaments-24.com

medicaments-24.com